Within each chapter, different options, from various time periods and countries, are mentioned, both as broad patterns and individual stories. For instance how one selected a spouse, the wedding itself, etc. The first part, historically oriented, is divided into chapters based on different aspects of marriage. This is due both to it's structure, which is rather open and flexible, and it's subjectivity. It's suited more to discussion or introspection than education or study. It's interesting, well-researched and spiced up with a lot of individual stories. Whether you are a student of history, a social scientist, or simply someone curious about how marriage has evolved, this book is sure to provide plenty of food for thought. Overall, "History of Marriage" is a highly informative and thought-provoking read that will appeal to anyone interested in the history of this enduring institution. She also examines the changing roles and expectations of spouses and how these have been influenced by factors such as religion, class, and gender. Abbott delves into the histories of various societies worldwide, including those that have practiced polygamy, arranged marriages, and even marriage-like partnerships between same-sex couples. One of the standout aspects of this book is how it challenges many of the assumptions and stereotypes we often have about marriage. Author Elizabeth Abbott does an excellent job of weaving together a wide range of sources and perspectives to provide a nuanced and well-rounded look at the various cultural, social, and economic factors that have shaped the meaning and function of marriage over time.
"History of Marriage" is a comprehensive and engaging exploration of the evolution of the institution of marriage throughout history. I am sorry, I really wanted to like this book. What am I going to remember from this book? Probably nothing.
It has no serious conclusions or statements, since it is made up of many minor details - some of which are very interesting - but still they don't seem to make up a bigger picture about the history of marriage, as well as about marriage today.
It is definitely not for experts in social history or any related field, but it is giving too little serious information to the gereral interested reader. It lacks references, and is full of vague statements. The problem of Elizabeth Abbott's book is a complete lack of focus, the fact that the intended audience is not clear (who are the meant readers of this book?), or the overall purpose (is it meant to inform? Amuse? Something else - what?). If I compared the two - I Don't: A Contrarian History of Marriage would definitely get 2 stars, but now it's too late. Now that I have read this one, I Don't: A Contrarian History of Marriage seems waaay better then when I read it this summer.
0 kommentar(er)
